|
Grant round winners 2010
In refractory epilepsy (RE), seizures are
unresponsive to anti-epileptic drug treatment
and this is the case for approximately a
third of people with epilepsy. RE is notoriously
difficult to treat and surgery to remove
the affected part of the brain is often
the best hope for seizure control.
Before surgery can proceed, doctors must
find out the region of the brain in which
the seizures begin (the seizure origin)
- i.e. the correct part of the brain to
remove. For many, this requires electrodes
to be placed onto and into the brain to
record the underlying electrical activity
(via EEG), and this is an invasive and uncomfortable
process. Prolonged recording with these
electrodes also carries the risk of infection.
Current data show that only half of people
who undergo epilepsy surgery achieve seizure
freedom, which indicates that current methods
to locate the seizure origin are far from
perfect.
Two advanced methods of brain investigation
have recently been developed; one that detects
abnormally fast rhythms of activity in groups
of neurons (called high frequency oscillations
- HFOs) in invasive EEG recordings; and
another that analyses the brain's response
to single pulses of electrical stimulation
(SPES), via implanted electrodes beneath
the scalp. These techniques usually only
require a few hours of recording time (far
less than the traditional EEG), but it remains
to be seen whether they can help to improve
the accuracy with which seizure origins
are identified.
Professor Matthew Walker and colleagues
from the Institute of Neurology, University,
College, London, in collaboration with
Kings College Hospital, London, have
been awarded £90,923 over 36
months for a project entitled Novel
methods for presurgical assessment of epilepsy.
In this study, the team will recruit people
with different kinds of epilepsy and use
first the HFO then the SPES method to locate
the seizure origin of each. They will take
recordings both before a seizure and at
the very beginning of a seizure, to try
to work out where it starts. The researchers
will be looking to see firstly, if it is
possible to record HFOs in this way and
secondly, if the results of both techniques
identify the same seizure origin.
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is entirely different method that can detect HFOs by measuring changes in magnetic field at the scalp surface, due to underlying neuronal activity. A major advantage of MEG is that it is not invasive, and so is a more appealing technique from a patient perspective than invasive EEG. However its accuracy in terms of finding the seizure location is not known. Professor Walker and his group will therefore use MEG to locate the seizure origin of all study participants and compare the results to those found with the other two methods. If they are found to correlate, MEG could potentially be an accurate and non-invasive method for pre-surgery assessment in the future, removing the need for invasive EEGs. This project will possibly lead to further studies, in which the seizure freedom rate of epilepsy surgery after MEG assessment is assessed. These will hopefully show an improvement on current rates.
|
|
|