|
15 August 2007
Despite the introduction of a large number
of new drugs in the last decade, the proportion
of people with epilepsy whose seizures are
not controlled with currently available
drugs has remained stable, at about 30%.
Epilepsy is not considered drug-resistant
or refractory until at least two anti-epileptic
drugs (AEDs) have been tried over a period
of two years, without significantly reducing
seizures. The consensus among doctors is
that the more drugs have been tried, the
more unlikely another one is to work.
Professor Jacqueline French of the University
of Pennsylvania, USA, investigated patient
records from 155 people with refractory
epilepsy aged 16 or over, treated at the
Penn Epilepsy Center, Philadelphia. They
all experienced at least one seizure a month
(though some experienced more than 10),
and had had epilepsy for between 6 and 54
years. Each of these people had previously
tried an average of 5.8 different AEDs,
though some had tried up to 15.
All patients received at least one new
AED during the study, either in addition
to their previous regimen, or replacing
one of their previous drugs. Sixteen percent
became seizure free for 12 months after
a change, and 21% experienced less than
half their usual number of seizures for
12 months after a change.
This is an unusual study, because it wasn't
trying to show that one drug is better than
another, just whether trying any new drug
works or not. The analysis indicates that
there's about a 15% chance of seizure freedom
when another AED is tried. This suggests
that keeping on trying new drugs is the
best policy for gaining seizure freedom,
and that improved control of seizures is
possible even for patients who have not
responded to several previous AEDs. This
contradicts commonly accepted beliefs about
refractory epilepsy, which says that there's
no point in constantly trying new drugs
as they have so little chance of making
any difference.
This study, published in Nature Clinical
Practice Neurology in July, is an exciting
hint that received wisdom may be wrong regarding
the treatment of refractory epilepsy. This
study only had a short follow-up time (12
months) so it doesn't provide the final
answer. However it does indicate that no
patient should lose hope, and that their
doctor should continue to try new combinations
of AEDs until they find one that works.
Read
more (free sign-up required)
|